Free assessment
Centralize documents, automate workflows and integrate systems with security and flexibility. Linte CLM adapts to your routine, never the other way around, and it was built for complex legal operations in large companies.
Fill in the form and our specialists get in touch.
Our platform complies with SOC 2 Type 2 and ISO 27001, with the highest standards of security and data protection.
Demo
See how Linte CLM follows every step of the contract cycle: intake form, automatic drafting, approval flows, AI analysis, signature, post signature management and renewal alerts.
The shift
What Linte CLM covers
Four fronts that cover the full contract cycle in a single platform, with end to end traceability.
Start with a simple intake form. Official data is filled in automatically, with real time validation. You define the variables and the clauses adjust on their own. A draft ready in a few clicks, without typing from scratch.
Automated flows connect areas end to end. When the draft comes from the counterparty, AI identifies risks and suggests adjustments to your standard. Signature integrated with Adobe Sign, DocuSign, ClickSign and D4Sign, without switching systems.
Ask questions and collaborate without leaving the platform. Every change is recorded with who did it, when and what. The conversation history stays with the contract flow, with automatic notices for attachments and updates.
The contract is signed, but management continues. See what matters, spot trends and make decisions based on data. Configure expiry alerts by deadline type and the system notifies the right owners, at the right frequency.
FAQ
Contract management, CLM, artificial intelligence, security and how Linte works in practice.
Contract management is the set of practices used to organize, track and govern a contract throughout its whole term. That includes controlling versions, approvals, signatures, deadlines, price adjustments, obligations, renewals and the history of each negotiation.
Storing the signed PDF is only part of the process. Mature contract management lets you answer quickly which contracts expire in a given period, which renew automatically, which obligations are pending and who is responsible for each step.
Because contracts cross legal, procurement, finance, sales and other areas, centralizing documents and data reduces parallel controls and improves traceability.
CLM stands for Contract Lifecycle Management. The concept covers the complete process, from the initial request to termination or renewal, bringing documents, owners, approvals and data together in a structured flow.
The most common stages are: request, drafting, review and negotiation, approval, signature, execution, obligation tracking and termination or renewal. Naming varies between companies, but the goal is the same: keeping the contract from being treated as just a file once it is signed.
A CLM platform helps standardize those stages, automate repetitive tasks and turn contract information into data you can query.
Electronic signature solves one specific step: formalizing the signature of the document. A CLM manages the entire contract cycle, including what happens before signing - request, drafting, review, negotiation and approval - and after it, such as obligations, deadlines, price adjustments, amendments, renewals and termination.
The two are complementary. When the signature tool is integrated into the CLM, the document can move from approval to signature and back to the repository with no download, no email round trip and no manual re-entry.
So a company can have efficient electronic signature and still need a more structured process to control contracts.
A spreadsheet can work when volume is small, few people update it and operational risk is low. It usually solves the basic record of term, value, owner and expiry date.
The problem shows up when control depends on manual updates and on someone remembering to open the file. Parallel versions, contracts scattered across folders and inboxes, automatic renewals discovered too late and doubts about which document is the valid one are signs that the spreadsheet stopped keeping up with the operation.
At that point the gain of a system is not just better storage: it is automatic alerts, ownership, history and process rules that do not depend on people's memory.
Reliable control combines three elements: identifying the relevant dates and obligations, defining who answers for each one and creating alerts early enough to act. A warning on the expiry date itself rarely solves the problem.
Beyond the contract end date, it is worth structuring automatic renewal, price adjustments, periodic deliveries, insurance, certificates, notices and other obligations set out in the clauses. How early the alert fires should vary with the risk and with the time needed to negotiate or execute.
At Linte, deadlines and obligations can be tracked in the same environment where the contract is stored, with owners and alerts tied to the process.
In procurement, contract management connects what was negotiated with what has to be delivered during the relationship with the supplier. The contract records commercial terms, service levels, price adjustments, deadlines, penalties, guarantees and compliance requirements.
A structured flow usually involves the requesting area, procurement, legal and the people responsible for executing the contract. After signature, tracking expiries, incidents, obligations and performance keeps important information from being scattered across spreadsheets and inboxes.
It also helps to see the relationship by supplier, and not only by document, since the same counterparty can have several active contracts, amendments and obligations.
Legal Operations, or Legal Ops, is the discipline that organizes how the legal department works: processes, technology, data, vendors, budget, metrics and operational capacity. The goal is to make legal delivery more predictable, measurable and scalable.
Traditional legal work concentrates on technical analysis, advice, negotiation and legal decision making. Legal Ops works on the structure that supports it: how requests come in, who handles them, which SLAs exist, where the bottlenecks are and which activities can be automated.
In practice the two complement each other. Legal stays responsible for technical judgment, while Legal Ops improves the system in which that work happens.
In-house legal advisory management is the organization of the questions and requests that reach legal before they become contracts, disputes or formal projects. That flow includes regulatory questions, opinions, risk analyses, approvals, internal guidance and requests from other areas.
To avoid requests scattered across email, chat and meetings, advisory work can run through a single front door, with request categories, mandatory information, priority, owner, SLA and a history of the answer. That makes volume, recurrence and time spent per subject visible.
With a structured flow, simple requests can be routed or standardized, while the legal team concentrates its analysis on the cases that really require judgment.
Supplier due diligence is the process of verifying information, documents and risks before approving or maintaining a relationship with a counterparty. Depending on company rules, that analysis can involve registration data, corporate documentation, tax standing, economic activity, compliance requirements and internal approvals.
At Linte this process can be structured as a single flow. The platform integrates with the Brazilian Federal Revenue Service, which allows information to be pulled automatically from the company registration number, such as the company's tax standing and economic activity codes. That data can support the analysis of whether the supplier fits the service being contracted and reduce manual checks.
It is also possible to connect the operation to the Dow Jones database to run name searches and support compliance checks. In that case Dow Jones is contracted directly by the client, and Linte performs the integration with the service, as happens with external electronic signature solutions.
From that information, rules can route approvals, exceptions and owners, keeping documents, evidence and decisions recorded in the same process to make audits and periodic reviews easier.
Corporate governance work can be automated by turning documents, approvals, signatures and recurring deadlines into structured flows. Minutes, powers of attorney, corporate amendments and shareholder meeting processes stop depending on isolated controls once every step has an owner, a status and recorded evidence.
A system can organize document templates, information gathering, approval thresholds, signature, the validity of powers of attorney and alerts for future events or obligations. The history also makes it easier to find the valid version and understand who approved each act.
How far automation goes depends on each company's corporate governance. Technology organizes the process and cuts manual work, while legal and corporate validation remains the team's responsibility.
Contract management software centralizes the creation, routing, signature and tracking of a company's contracts in a single environment. It replaces controls fragmented across email, folders, spreadsheets, text editors and signature tools used in isolation.
The main gains are less manual work, standardized flows, alerts for deadlines and obligations, an auditable history of changes and better access to contract data. In larger operations another important benefit is predictability: the process stops depending on whoever is handling each contract.
Depending on the solution, the system can also bring AI, dashboards, intake forms, document templates and integrations with other corporate systems.
The choice should start from the process the company needs to govern, not just from a feature list. The first test is whether the tool adapts to the flows, fields, permissions and rules of the operation, or whether it requires the company to work in a single way.
It is also worth assessing integration with ERP, CRM, document management and signature tools; post-signature management; security and access controls; migration of the legacy base; ease of use; available metrics; and the rollout and support model.
Another point is to separate CLM, document management and ERP. Document management organizes files, the ERP controls transactions and operational data, and the CLM governs the contract as a process. In many scenarios integration between them matters more than trying to replace one with another.
Yes. AI can speed up review by summarizing documents, locating clauses, comparing versions, spotting departures from a standard and highlighting points that need attention. That cuts the time spent reading and checking.
The quality of the analysis depends on the context available. An AI that knows only the document can explain the text; a solution connected to the playbook, the clause library and the company's rules can compare that contract with the internal standard.
The recommendation is to keep human oversight for legal and commercial decisions. AI works better as support for analysis than as an automatic replacement for the team's judgment.
A general purpose AI tool and a CLM solve different layers of the work. ChatGPT or Copilot can help summarize, explain, compare or analyze the content of a document. A CLM governs the process in which that document exists.
That includes request intake, templates, review, approvals, permissions, signature, history, deadlines, obligations, metrics and integration with other systems. Instead of relying on isolated analyses, the CLM keeps the contract connected to the flow and to the company's rules.
The two approaches can coexist. For a recurring operation, the main point is guaranteeing context, governance, traceability and continuity between the analysis done by the AI and the next steps of the process.
It depends on the vendor, the product and the settings contracted. There is no single rule for every artificial intelligence tool. In a corporate assessment, the company should confirm in writing whether inputs and outputs are used for training, how long data is retained, who can access it and which deletion and audit controls exist.
It is also worth reviewing encryption, data segregation, subprocessors, processing location, access controls, the DPA and audited certifications. The core point is governance: knowing exactly how the data is handled at each step.
At Linte, the specific data processing conditions should be presented according to the security documentation and the contract applicable to the project.
It can, and that is an important criterion when choosing a CLM. Without integration, the contract system risks becoming one more tool that has to be fed by hand, creating rework and duplicated information.
At Linte, four electronic signature providers already have native integration: Clicksign, D4Sign, DocuSign and Adobe Acrobat Sign. Native integrations with other signature providers are not currently planned. For other needs, Linte offers a public API that lets the client build integrations with their own systems or third party solutions, within the contracted request limits.
That makes it possible to connect Linte to ERPs, CRMs, document management systems, repositories and other tools used by the company, according to the architecture and needs of each operation.
Beyond API integrations, Linte also offers connectivity through MCP (Model Context Protocol). With it, AI tools and agents approved by the company can access information from contracts stored in Linte in a controlled way, respecting permissions and the context made available. The company can then use its own AI platform to query contract data and support analysis without taking documents out of the management environment.
There is no single timeline for implementing a CLM. It depends on the initial scope, the number of flows and documents, the level of customization, integrations, the availability of key people and the strategy for migrating the historical base.
Leaner projects can start with the priority flows and expand later. Projects that try to migrate all the legacy, integrate several systems and redesign many processes at the same time require a longer stage of discovery, validation and testing.
So, when comparing vendors, it is worth asking not only "how long does it take", but which deliverables belong to each phase, who has to take part and what the criterion for go-live is.
Migration is feasible, but the effort depends on how contracts and data are organized today. A base with centralized documents and consistent fields is different from a scenario with scattered files, different names, duplicated versions and relevant information living only in spreadsheets.
The project usually needs to define what will be migrated, which metadata will be preserved or created, how to handle duplicated documents and what the rule will be for terminated, active and new contracts. The transition can also happen in stages, starting with active or more critical contracts.
The goal is not just moving files to another repository, but turning the legacy into a reliable base for search, alerts, obligations and metrics.
Linte is a platform for managing contracts and corporate processes that connects documents, requests, automation, data and artificial intelligence. The goal is to let the contract and other requests be tracked as a process, and not merely stored after signature.
An operation can start with a request, move through drafting, review and approval flows, go through signature and continue in the tracking of deadlines, obligations and metrics. The platform can also be used by areas beyond legal, according to the flows configured.
The structure includes solutions such as Linte CLM, Intake, Linte AI and Linte BI, plus integrations with tools the company already uses.
Yes. Linte applies artificial intelligence to the documents and data of the operation. Uses include reading and extracting information, supporting review, comparing versions and querying content in the base, according to the features enabled in the project.
The practical difference is context: the AI can work connected to the contracts, fields, rules and documents that are already part of the operation, instead of analyzing each file in isolation. That reduces reading and cataloguing work and speeds up finding the points that need human analysis.
The final decision stays with the team, while the process and the relevant interactions remain inside the platform's governance.
Contracts can carry personal, financial, commercial and strategic information, so security has to be part of the assessment of any CLM. The main points include access control, encryption, data segregation, audit trail, vendor management and formal security processes.
Linte publishes security controls audited under SOC 2 Type 2. The public and commercial security documentation should hold the up to date list of certifications, controls and evidence available for vendor approval and due diligence processes.
For a technical assessment, the ideal is to cross the FAQ with the current security documentation and, when needed, involve the responsible team to answer the client's specific requirements.
Rollout starts with understanding the scope and the priority flows. From there, documents, fields, rules, owners, permissions and required integrations are mapped; then come configuration, testing with key users, training and going live.
Migration of the historical base has to be defined in the project. Depending on volume and on the company's strategy, the transition can be structured in stages, prioritizing active contracts or the most critical flows.
After go-live, service can include the Help Center, support and Customer Success follow-up according to the plan and the project contracted.
Linte support is available through several channels:
